The problem here is that the kind of evidence that is typically invoked by theists in order to substantiate the existence of God — for example, the cosmological and design arguments, appeals to religious experience — does not even aim to establish the existence of a perfectly good being, or else, if it does have such an aim, it faces formidable difficulties in fulfilling it.
He has argued that suffering serves a number of purposes. Things can't always be how we would like them to be. Here it is important first to recognize that we live in a fallen world, and that we are subject to natural disasters that would not have occurred had man not chosen to rebel against God.
Even so, it is difficult to imagine how we could function as free creatures in a world much different than our own—a world in which consistent natural processes allow us to predict with some certainty the consequences of our choices and actions.
The Openness of God: But examples of apparently pointless evils could be multiplied indefinitely, and some evils are so egregiously awful that no conceivable attendant good would be great enough to justify permitting them. On e we see that evil causes some geographical and temporal problems.
The Coherence of Theism.
Otherwise, when do they suppose this man sinned that he was born blind. Sceptics may feel that this is clear evidence that reports of miraculous cures are unreliable, and improvements in medical technology are gradually making miraculous explanations redundant. Second, God need not perform spectacular miracles to help the survivors of natural disasters.
The Case for Freewill Theism: But creatures who are free to love God must also be free to hate or ignore Him. What then is your question. Jesus Himself keenly felt the painful side of life.
Scepticism of this sort does have the appearance of a kind of evasive damage-limitation exercise, although the theists who accept it would, of course, deny this.
Similarly, given my lack of training in painting, I fail to see why Picasso arranged the figures in Guernica as he did. In responding to the challenge to belief in God based on the intensity and seeming purposelessness of much evil in the world, we must also take into account all of the positive evidence that points to his existence: Therefore, an omnipotent, omnibenevolent and omniscient god does not exist.
On what grounds does Rowe think that P is true. However, this is not a self-evident truth, and moral philosophers have constructed numerous ethical theories that are both objective and absolute and yet posit no lawgiver.
Free will The problem of evil is sometimes explained as a consequence of free willan ability granted by God. It is entirely possible that such reasons are not only beyond our present knowledge, but also beyond our present ability to understand.
Evidential Arguments from Evil The argument from evil (or problem of evil) is the argument that an all-powerful, all-knowing, and perfectly good God would not allow any—or certain kinds of—evil or suffering to occur. Jan 28, · The Evidential Problem of Evil is related to the Logical Problem of Evil in that it tries to show that the characteristics of God, as He is commonly conceived, are inconsistent with what we observe in the world.
The Evidential Problem of Evil differs from the Logical version in Author: Cristofer Urlaub. The problem of evil is often formulated in two forms: the logical problem of evil and the evidential problem of evil. The logical form of the argument tries to show a logical impossibility in the coexistence of God and evil,   while the evidential form tries to show that given the evil in the world, it is improbable that there is an.
The Problem of Evil – Introduction. John Stott has said that “the fact of suffering undoubtedly constitutes the single greatest challenge to the Christian faith.” It is unquestionably true that there is no greater obstacle to faith than that of the reality of evil and suffering in the world.
The Evidential Problem of Evil. While most.
The evidential problem of evil is the problem of determining whether and, if so, to what extent the existence of evil (or certain instances, kinds, quantities, or distributions of evil) constitutes evidence against the existence of God, that is to say, a being perfect in power, knowledge and goodness.
Evidential arguments from evil attempt to.
Introduction to Philosophy. Chapter 6: Philosophy of Religion. Search for: Problem of Evil (Logical and Evidential Problem) Logical problem of evil. Originating with Greek philosopher Epicurus, the logical argument from evil is as follows: Evidential problem of evil.An introduction to the evidential problem of evil